Standing with America’s Wild Horses
The Wild Horse Defense Fund fuels Return to Freedom’s selective litigation efforts, humane observation of roundups, policy reform, and advocacy.
Our wild horses and burros are caught in a battle over the use of our federal and state lands and the distribution of the natural resources there. With no one directly profiting from their freedom, wild horses and burros have been systematically captured and removed from the American West in response to pressure from ranching, hunting, mining, and other economically driven special interest groups.
The protection and conservation of our natural resources is paramount to restoring balance on America’s vast rangelands, so that true preservation, within a truly wild environment, might one day be possible.
Our work includes making the case for the quantifiable value of the American Wild Horse free on the range, in order for decisionmakers to better protect them. Eco-tourists and international visitors clamor to view the American Mustang in the wild. The potential for this industry over the next 20 years (as was the case for the whale watching industry), if we save wild horses on the range, is growing.
When you donate to our Wild Horse Defense Fund you are helping RTF’s work to:
End Horse slaughter
Litigate against precedent setting and illegal actions by agencies.
Hold agencies accountable to maintain existing humane and legal standards.
Improve policies to protect wild horses and burros on the range as well as after their capture.
Fund Humane Observation – RTF’s humane observers and photographers are on-the-ground witnesses who document helicopter roundups and the handling of wild horses by Bureau of Land Management contractors, conditions of wild horse handling and management in holding facilities, adoptions and on the range. Having an active voice has proven valuable for holding BLM and its contractors accountable for the humane handling of wild horses, pressing for improvements to humane standards, and educating policymakers and the public about how tax dollars are used on our shared public lands.
You can help spare American horses by joining Return to Freedom in demanding that Congress pass the bipartisan Save America’s Forgotten Equines Act or SAFE Act (H.R. 3355 in the House, S. 2732) which would ban both slaughter and the transportation of horses for slaughter. Doing so will prevent the needless suffering of America’s equines – including wild horses and burros.
Call for an end to horse slaughter and the export of horses for slaughter:
Please call (202) 224-3121 and urge your representative and senators to support the SAFE Act (H.R. 3355 in the House, S. 2732 in the Senate) and ask them to call for a hearing on this important legislation.
For More Ways To Take Action —CLICK HERE
RTF, with Front Range Equine Rescue (FRER), photographers Meg Frederick and Angelique Rea, has been actively monitoring the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) plan to benefit private ranchers and eliminate vast portions Wyoming wild horse territory, and the horses who live there. Our lawsuit is ready to go once BLM releases their final Range Management Plan (RMP) for the area. This is a clear violation of BLM’s mandate to protect and preserve our wild horse herds and cater to private ranching interests who are monopolizing a vast territory. The Rock Springs grazing Association is a powerful special interest group using it’s clout to control a vast expanse of our public lands within a ‘checkerboarded’ with private lands. Wyoming is a ‘fence out’ state and instead of persecuting the wild horse herds who manage to survive the extreme winters and are treasured by many, they could choose non-hostile co-existence ( Co- exist and hold BLM accountable to implement a fertility control program, land swaps, fence their private property with incentives for corridors to name a few).
Currently holding facilities in Wyoming are badly managed and inhumanely crowded. In one 10 acre facility contracted on private land, 3500 captured wild horses are housed.
We need your help to fight BLM’s plan to:
• remove roughly 2 million acres of wild horse territory use, and the horses who live there, in the Salt Wells and Great Divide Herd Management Areas;
• effectively “zero out” (eliminate) the 393,000-acre White Mountain Herd Management Area by making the herd “non-reproducing” — with the possibility of dangerous, inhumane, unproven, and costly surgical sterilization of mares, ineffective sex-ratio skewing, and gelding stallions;
• round up 2/3 of the horses on the 478,000-acre Adobe Town Herd Management Area.
PAST / INNACTIVE
It is RTF’s contention that the BLM ignored the Wild Free Roaming Horses and Burros Act when they bowed to pressure from private landowners who were part of the Rock Springs Grazing Association (RSGA) to remove “nuisance’ horses from their private lands. In doing so, BLM also captured federally protected wild horses on public lands. RTF has been in and out court throughout 2015 and will continue to challenge what it considers to be the unlawful removal of wild horses.
Landmark Updates October 2016
On Oct. 14, 2016 the 10th Circuit of Appeals ruled that the Bureau of Land Management in 2014 violated two federal laws, the Wild Free Roaming Horses and Burros Act and the Federal Land Policy Management Act, when it captured and removed 1,263 wild horses from Wyoming’s Checkerboard Region.
That ruling came three days after the 10th Circuit upheld a lower court’s dismissal of a lawsuit filed by the State of Wyoming against the BLM, also in 2014, seeking removal of wild horses from public lands.
The 10th Circuit rejected the state’s arguments that BLM was required to remove the horses because the Wild Free Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971 doesn’t define the phrase “appropriate management level.”
Bill Eubanks of Meyer, Glitzenstein and Eubanks, who represented Return to Freedom and its fellow plaintiffs, believes that this will be precedent-setting decision with “important implications for federal wild horse policy for decades to come.”
On the heels of the Oct. 14 ruling, the BLM cancelled another roundup of 500 horses in the Checkerboard planned for this month.
RTF is proud to share these victories with The American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign — which funded and did the heavy lifting in the 2014 cases — and fellow plaintiffs The Cloud Foundation, wild horse photographers Carol Walker and Kimerlee Curyl, and supporters of wild horses and burros like you.
Wyoming Checkerboard Wild Horse Roundups & News
The organizations argue that the agency’s plan to permanently sterilize the entire herd of wild horses in the Saylor Creek Herd Management Area (HMA) violates the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971 (“Wild Horse Act”) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
Saylor Creek Wild Horse Roundups & News
Advocates, including Return to Freedom, argued their case in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on January 11, 2017, in an effort to reverse a decision by the U.S. Forest Service to remove 23,000 acres from the heart of one of California’s only wild horse territories.
The appeals court is expected to release its ruling in two to three months. Still active/pending.
During the mid-1980s, the U.S. Forest Service added 23,000 acres to the Devil’s Garden Plateau Wild Horse Territory in Northern California and later, in 1991, the agency formalized the change as part of the plan for Modoc National Forest. The Forest Service maintained minimum populations of wild horses on these additional lands until December 2012. Then, the Forest Service announced that the expanded acreage for wild horses was “an administrative mistake,” and that it planned to capture and remove all horses from the expanded area.
The wild horse advocates contend that the Forest Service’s about-face on a policy that it had followed for years is detrimental to more than the wild horses at Devil’s Garden: If agencies can make such changes without a coherent and logical explanation for doing so, without supporting documents, it puts all wild horse territories at risk.
In 2016, a lower court failed to acknowledge the plaintiffs’ complaint that the Forest Service’s decision violates federal animal protection and environmental laws and unlawfully prioritizes ranchers and privately owned livestock above federally protected wild horses.